[Noisebridge-discuss] When were bunk-beds installed?

[Danny O'Brien]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:

> the problem is that a troll on a troll gets lost in translation.  The bunk
> beds were originally installed as a troll on noisebridge's sleeper problem,
> and now people don't realize it was a terrible joke, so they actually
> believe that noisebridge is a place for people to go to sleep.
>

(that isn't actually true -- I think they were a sincere attempt to narrow
down a particular problem. I think they probably made things worse.)

d.


> what a terrible thing to do to a hackerspace in the mission.
>
> -jake
>
>
> Eric W. Rasmussen wrote:
>
> I was being sarcastic.
>
> On 07/10/2013 02:13 AM, Robert Picone wrote:
>
>> Isn't part of the point for them to be visible?  As I understand it,
>> one of the biggest issues with sleeping at noisebridge was people
>> slipping somewhere out of sight to actually use as a bedroom rather
>> than a place to drowse off temporarily, knowing they'll be wakened soon.
>>
>> If someone is snoring particularly noticeably in the stackers and not
>> actively hacking as they do so, I don't see any reason why you
>> shouldn't wake them and explain that they're making it harder to work,
>> and that they should try to avoid sleeping at the space anyway.  You
>> should treat it like you'd treat anyone else that was being loud
>> without doing any actual hacking.
>>
>> Only if you actually see wires sticking out of their head, or some
>> sort of hacked apnea-abating device plugged into their face should you
>> really feel any obligation to actually let them sleep if it's
>>
> disruptive.
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Eric W. Rasmussen <ewr at majortek.com
>> <mailto:ewr at majortek.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     If the beds were in a separate lab room, I wouldn't have a
>>     problem. But the beds are in the middle of the space and it forces
>>     other members to endure snoring and the such.
>>
>>     Why don't you substitute the "Photo Lab" for the "Nuerosky Lab"?
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.**noisebridge.net<Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/**mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-**discuss<https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130710/dbf2bc78/attachment-0003.html>