[Noisebridge-discuss] Anarchist? Libertarian?
Johny Radio
johnyradio at gmail.com
Wed Jul 31 16:24:50 UTC 2013
Rachel McConnell rachel at xtreme.com, Wed Jul 31 15:07:29 UTC 2013 wrote:
>"As one of the founding members, I can say that I am not an anarchist
and anarchy was never one of the goals of Noisebridge.... You can
describe it as anarchistic if you feel it fits... but do not think that
means everyone, or the organization in general, will agree with the label."
"I" do not label it so. Anarchy simply appears to be integral to the
history, language, and current operations of the place, as described in
my last post-- Anarchy, or something inspired by it, as conceived by NB
members who preceded my arrival here, including the two people who i
understand to be the founders, Jacob Appelbaum and Mitch Altman. Since
NB is politically heterogeneous, I would expect disagreement on what NB
should be.
The primary Noisebridge decision-making instrument, Consensus, comes
straight outta Anarchist theory and practice. Do you disagree with that
statement?
Leaderless structure is a core Anarchist principal. Do you disagree with
that statement?
This is not my idea or label. Personally, I'm not an Anarchist either
(although I agree with some anarchist ideas). I feel the Consensus
concept is flawed. i also feel NB's implementation of Consensus is
flawed. But that has not stopped me from being a participant in
Noisebridge for 3 years.
"There are lots of fascinating challenges to running a hackerspace using
the purest anarchist collective principles...."
https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Social_Engineers
--
Johny Radio
Stick It In Your Ear!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130731/d1c91486/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list