[Noisebridge-discuss] Get the F Out!

[Taylor Alexander]

What? 9/11 conspiracy theories and US government mind control? This thread
is hilarious!
On Mar 14, 2013 12:37 PM, "Gopiballava Flaherty" <gopiballava at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> > don't forget that the fires in towers 1 and 2 burned for only for about
> an hour, and
>
> Don't forget that there was structural damage and flammable liquid added,
> which weren't present in the other building fires.
>
> > building 7 burned for maybe 8 hours but kindof a small pathetic fire.
>
> Can you clarify what you mean by "small pathetic fire"? The photos here
> make that characterization sound inaccurate:
> http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_fire.html
>
> > these were some big skyscraper fires (no collapses though):
> >
> > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
>
> Six fires, none of which had physical damage to the building at the onset
> of them. WTC7 was hit by debris:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf8wR9PQSPc
>
> There was enough debris around WTC7 that emergency services had trouble
> getting in to the building:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wieK2a_d-8s
>
> So in terms of core facts:
> a) The buildings did not collapse into their own footprints as you claimed
> b) The fire in WTC7 was not small or pathetic by any rational definition;
> smoke was billowing out every floor
>
> I suspect that you probably have numerous other reasons that you're
> convinced that the official story is wrong. Before you start enumerating
> those, please ask yourself: When you *start* with inaccuracies, why would
> you expect people to keep listening? When I see a report and follow the
> first citation, and find it misrepresents the source, I stop reading. Not
> worth the time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> gopi.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130314/0451202c/attachment-0003.html>