[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposals
dharlette at gmail.com
Mon Nov 18 17:34:00 UTC 2013
As an aside, Valerie Aurora of the Ada Initiative just posted a fantastic
article about exactly this topic (why telling women to fight back
physically against harassers is a bad idea that arises out of a lot of
pretty sexist assumptions). You should all go read it.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Romy Snowyla <romy at snowyla.com> wrote:
> There's a silver lining to these many threads
> While the sexual harassment policy is generating many heated discussions
> I'm happy that people think about gender, sexism and so on a noisebridge.
> It's challenging and messy but I'm so used to tech spaces being so male
> that discussing gender theory was like speaking in pig Latin
> I don't really want to join an all women or woman only space even though
> those groups can be fun for some people.
> Id consider joining a female space if if feminism discussions never
> occurred at noise bridge
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 17, 2013, at 3:44 AM, spinach williams <spinach.williams at gmail.com>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>> Corrected again. I had thought anarchy referred
>> to a community organization without formal rules,
>> that "anarchists love rules; they just don't
>> love rulers."
> that's an oversimplification if ever there was one
>> Y'all certainly have gotten excited about sexual
>> harassment issues.
> naturally, people would be quite excited to finally be treated like human
> beings within a community of their peers. it's kinda nice, pretty excellent
> to be met with the basic level of decency men hold for those they consider
> people. definitely something to get excited about.
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss