[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposals

Romy Snowyla romy at snowyla.com
Mon Nov 18 03:49:00 UTC 2013

There's a silver lining to these many threads 

While the sexual harassment policy is generating many heated discussions I'm happy that people think about gender, sexism and so on a noisebridge. It's challenging and messy but I'm so used to tech spaces being so male that discussing gender theory was like speaking in pig Latin

I don't really want to join an all women or woman only space even though those groups can be fun for some people. 

 Id consider joining a female space if if feminism discussions never occurred at noise bridge 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 17, 2013, at 3:44 AM, spinach williams <spinach.williams at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>>     Corrected again. I had thought anarchy referred
>> to a community organization without formal rules,
>> that "anarchists love rules; they just don't
>> love rulers."
> that's an oversimplification if ever there was one
>>     Y'all certainly have gotten excited about sexual
>> harassment issues.
> naturally, people would be quite excited to finally be treated like human beings within a community of their peers. it's kinda nice, pretty excellent to be met with the basic level of decency men hold for those they consider people. definitely something to get excited about. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131117/53d7f2ae/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list