[Noisebridge-discuss] proposal for noisebridge membership changes

[jim]

??? 
    My proposal is to keep things as they have been, 
not institute new policies that seem to me to have 
unpleasant affects. 
    I think we each should deal with problems as they 
occur and ask each other for help when we feel help 
is needed. 
    I like minimizing the number of official pleas 
for help at the Tuesday night meetings. 
    Oh yeah, I believe Jake's well-intended proposal 
is probably unworkable because of the 
enforcement-surveillance aspect. 



On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:04 -0700, spinach williams wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2013 9:26 AM, "jim" <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> >      Pluses and minuses. I like the tone and
> > some of the people who've been attracted. I
> > hate that my stuff has been stolen. I also
> > hate drunks and sloppy dopers.
> and how would your proposal affect people who already disrespect the
> space in these ways, as opposed to our current approach of either
> asking them to leave or just not letting them in? how does a members
> only policy with our same autamated lock downstairs stem the tide of
> tailgaters mentioned earlier? how can this proposal possibly change
> the way we approach people who've been welcomed to the space, who have
> used the space in general accordance with our tennets except for their
> unfortunate habits of theft or harassment? what does this proposal
> actually do aside from subject everyone to additional surveillance?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss