[Noisebridge-discuss] The image we have to other hackerspaces and society as a whole

[Rachel McConnell]

Can you define the problem?

There have been many attempts to fix it, and from where I stand they all 
seem to be addressing different-but-related issues, and tend to fail 
because Solution X doesn't solve Problem Y, and Problem Y's proponents 
either refuse to follow along with Solution X, or sometimes actively try 
to break it.

I wish you luck, I'd love to feel NB was a place I want to go to again.

Rachel1.0

On 10/4/13 6:51 PM, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
> Sure.  Lets fix this in two weeks.  This saturday and sunday I am busy
> but who wants to get together every day for the next two weeks or
> however long it takes to sort out, starting monday and get this shit
> sorted out?  I am free after work.  Lets solve this.   Lets talk it out,
> lets figure this crap out once and for all.  We are smart people, we can
> do this.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org
> <mailto:schoen at loyalty.org>> wrote:
>
>     Ronald Cotoni writes:
>
>      > With articles like this we have a massively negative image, as we
>     should
>      > for not adequately dealing with these issues.
>
>     As I said a while ago, at 83C there was a very strong understanding that
>     Noisebridge should not create rules _preemptively_.  But at 2169 there
>     seems to be an understanding that Noisebridge should never create rules
>     _at all_.
>
>     I think the new understanding is severely broken.
>
>     --
>     Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org <mailto:schoen at loyalty.org>>
>         |  No haiku patents
>     http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/        |  means I've no incentive to
>        FD9A6AA28193A9F03D4BF4ADC11B36DC9C7DD150  |        -- Don Marti
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>