[Noisebridge-discuss] noisebridge is for hacking

[Davidfine]

Noisebridge exists and was founded to empower any person so desiring to
become more in control of technology.
We can absolutely exclude people from the space. Not every activity that
could be called hacking is allowed or tolerated. Don't allow yourself to
be manipulated by word games. You're not a jerk for enforcing boundaries.

Instead of saying /Noisebridge is for //Hackers/, try /Noisebridge is
for hacking/. You can discuss a person's actions without judging their
abilities or value as a human being.
If Neo and Morepheus use the space as a crash pad, I will ask them to
leave. But Randall the crusty street kid can come and build analog
circuits all day, that's cool. You see how that works.

--D



On 9/2/13 11:13 AM, jim wrote:
>     Kind of. It was formed with the idea of merging 
> different disciplines such as art and technology, 
> more specifically, for example, sewing and 
> electronics. 
>
>     The definition of "hack" has eluded us to the 
> point that there seems no useful definition that 
> lets us exclude anyone on that basis. 
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 10:58 -0700, Romy Ilano wrote:
>> noisebridge was formed, built and paid for hacking. it is a place to
>> hack. that's what it's for. that is noisebridge's focus.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130903/b6119349/attachment-0003.html>