[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Bylaws

Al Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 15:17:54 UTC 2014

So Naomi, does that mean you agree that the Noisebridge bylaws can't be
On Apr 6, 2014 6:15 PM, "Naomi Gmail" <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Good constructive question.
> If we can't agree on the bylaws as a firm basis, then we have no
> foundation at all, and nothing we do in writing or at meetings will help to
> bring this disparate community together.
> I am not for changing the bylaws, at all.  Don't see any need to.
> Of possible relevance:
> In proposing a rewrite -- or better stated, a "renewal"-- of a Mission
> Statement, it wasn't my intention to imply a rewrite to the bylaws. Only a
> rewriting (or not!) of what appears on the wiki as the explanation of what
> Noisebridge "does" and why, and more importantly, a process of coming to
> the agreement that helps the community understand itself better.
> --Naomi
> > On Apr 6, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So, I'm of the mindset that the Noisebridge bylaws are not suggestions,
> but rules that cannot be ignored or are somehow optional. Anyone else like
> to make a public record if they feel the same way or the opposite?
> >
> > -Al
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140407/1fb87db4/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list