[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Bylaws
setient at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 16:01:16 UTC 2014
I agree that they cannot be ignored if noisebridge w a nuts to exist.
On Apr 7, 2014 8:18 AM, "Al Sweigart" <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
> So Naomi, does that mean you agree that the Noisebridge bylaws can't be
> On Apr 6, 2014 6:15 PM, "Naomi Gmail" <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good constructive question.
>> If we can't agree on the bylaws as a firm basis, then we have no
>> foundation at all, and nothing we do in writing or at meetings will help to
>> bring this disparate community together.
>> I am not for changing the bylaws, at all. Don't see any need to.
>> Of possible relevance:
>> In proposing a rewrite -- or better stated, a "renewal"-- of a Mission
>> Statement, it wasn't my intention to imply a rewrite to the bylaws. Only a
>> rewriting (or not!) of what appears on the wiki as the explanation of what
>> Noisebridge "does" and why, and more importantly, a process of coming to
>> the agreement that helps the community understand itself better.
>> > On Apr 6, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > So, I'm of the mindset that the Noisebridge bylaws are not suggestions,
>> but rules that cannot be ignored or are somehow optional. Anyone else like
>> to make a public record if they feel the same way or the opposite?
>> > -Al
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss