[Noisebridge-discuss] the board election was crap and you know it.
orenbeck at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 19:37:03 UTC 2014
Hi- may it please the involved parties to contemplate discussion of
"External Oversight" as an antidote to any Ethical Conflicts? Linited
solely to electoral event/s
One sentence summation: Noisebridge might consider a SWIFT consensus on
External Observation for Electoral Processes as befits a
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes I very much agree with Johny.
> I'm already working on a document that specifically limits the board
> to certain types of activities. Seen positively, this will prevent
> the board from spinning its wheels on a huge pile of things it
> shouldn't bother with.
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: "Kevin" <bfb at riseup.net>
> >> Are you volunteering to run the 2014 Noisebridge BoD election v2? I am
> >> happy to share my experience with our chosen electioneer.
> > whether or not there is another election, I humbly suggest NB'ers first
> > clear about what the Board is and isn't, what they can and cannot do.
> Naomi Theora Most
> naomi at nthmost.com
> skype: nthmost
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss