[Noisebridge-discuss] the board election was crap and you know it.
pnaomi at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 20:15:36 UTC 2014
Jebus! That's a fantastic idea.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Oren Beck <orenbeck at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi- may it please the involved parties to contemplate discussion of
> "External Oversight" as an antidote to any Ethical Conflicts? Linited solely
> to electoral event/s
> One sentence summation: Noisebridge might consider a SWIFT consensus on
> External Observation for Electoral Processes as befits a
> Oren Beck
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes I very much agree with Johny.
>> I'm already working on a document that specifically limits the board
>> to certain types of activities. Seen positively, this will prevent
>> the board from spinning its wheels on a huge pile of things it
>> shouldn't bother with.
>> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > From: "Kevin" <bfb at riseup.net>
>> >> Are you volunteering to run the 2014 Noisebridge BoD election v2? I am
>> >> happy to share my experience with our chosen electioneer.
>> > whether or not there is another election, I humbly suggest NB'ers first
>> > get
>> > clear about what the Board is and isn't, what they can and cannot do.
>> Naomi Theora Most
>> naomi at nthmost.com
>> skype: nthmost
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss