[Noisebridge-discuss] Google Glass at the space?

[Nick Owens]

On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 03:37:13PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> This really is in no way a constructive response.  I would expect
> that there would be a reasoning behind it as opposed to just a
> "that's a bad idea" sort of reply.

okay.

for starters, there's an item in the anti-harassment policy about
'harassing photography or recording'. ostensibly glass could be used to
do that.

secondly, a lot of folks at noisebridge just plain don't like people
photographing or recording them. it's common courtesy at the space to
ask everyone who could possibly be photographed or recorded if they
consent to such.

on top of that, it's just plain stupid to expect that these devices will
in fact remain at noisebridge. such an expensive and in-demand item
would surely not last long.

not only that, there's plenty of people in sf that just don't like
glass. including many businesses in the near vicinity of noisebridge.

http://www.glasshole-free.org/

> We can all agree that anything learned via experimentation is worth
> the money invested AND if we can get more security at the space it
> would be an added bonus!

https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2013-January/034191.html

i echo Martin's sentiment. draw your own conclusions.

i apologize for being short with you in my first reply. i hope this
email clears things up.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140413/98390988/attachment.sig>