[Noisebridge-discuss] 90 Day "Ban" on banning people.

Ronald Cotoni setient at gmail.com
Sun Feb 23 21:57:25 UTC 2014


Right.  I think we need a more automated approach.
On Feb 23, 2014 12:09 PM, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 23 February 2014 12:07, John Ellis <neurofog at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is getting to be way too much drama.
> >
> > IMO We should put all permanent bans on hold for 90 days. Having people
> take
> > a break for a period of time (Up to 180 Days) is still an available
> option.
> >
> > -John
> >
> > [1] https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items
>
> What's the drama?
>
>
> -a
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140223/2ffecc87/attachment.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list