[Noisebridge-discuss] 90 Day "Ban" on banning people.
dharlette at gmail.com
Sun Feb 23 22:35:38 UTC 2014
I am strongly opposed to us hamstringing our ability to remove potentially
toxic individuals from our midst. If you think someone shouldn't be
banned, go to the meeting and argue in their favor.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:
> Right. I think we need a more automated approach.
> On Feb 23, 2014 12:09 PM, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 23 February 2014 12:07, John Ellis <neurofog at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This is getting to be way too much drama.
>> > IMO We should put all permanent bans on hold for 90 days. Having people
>> > a break for a period of time (Up to 180 Days) is still an available
>> > -John
>> >  https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items
>> What's the drama?
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss