[Noisebridge-discuss] "Banning" discussion tonight

Ronald Cotoni setient at gmail.com
Wed Feb 26 01:53:50 UTC 2014


Come to a meeting.  Read the bylaws and look at the wiki.  These questions
can be answered by those things
On Feb 25, 2014 5:47 PM, "Charles Tang" <cjtang1 at asu.edu> wrote:

> Is active member defined be the label "member" or is it define by those
> who are "active."
>
> Or is there really a mythical "active member"
> --
> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2014 17:42, Darius Garza <313kid at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > "A ban from the Noisebridge space may be a useful social punishment for
>> a
>> > social crime"
>> >
>> > Noisebridge is a lot of things, but it certainly isn't up to anyone to
>> use
>> > it as a "social punishment" tool.
>>
>> ... noisebridge is apparently whatever the active membership decide it
>> is. I thought that was the point.
>>
>>
>> -a
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140225/3215c43f/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list