[Noisebridge-discuss] Let's use a Git repo to manage our massive, sprawling bureaucracy
gagliardi.curtis at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 18:39:21 UTC 2014
We already have a github, and everyone who knows how to use git already
uses it, I don't really see why we'd want to bother hosting it ourselves.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Henner Zeller <h.zeller at acm.org> wrote:
> If Germany can store their federal laws in github (
> https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze ), Noisebridge should be able to do
> so as well :)
> (Though admittedly, they don't really seem to be actively submitting stuff
> On 16 January 2014 09:25, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 15 January 2014 23:18, Carlos Sosa <gnusosa at gnusosa.net> wrote:
>> > James Sundquist <sundquistjames at gmail.com> writes:
>> >> https://gitorious.org/
>> >> This can be a fun way to host it ourselves!
>> > I disagree, I find gitorious an overkill, when we already have Apache
>> > HTTPD, and we can roll out gitweb easily.
>> >  http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-on-the-Server-GitWeb
>> > - Carlos Sosa
>> You can host it yourselves. You can also mirror it on
>> github.com/noisebridge/ and let people send pull requests there.
>> Funny this git thing; it's almost like it's trying to avoid the
>> "What's the authoritative source?" question.
>> (The troll in me wants to say something like "I thought this would
>> appease the noisebridge'rs, but ..)
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss