[Noisebridge-discuss] Linux study group hdwe?

[spinach williams]

On Jul 2, 2014 1:16 PM, "maestro" <maestro415 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Things that are clearly MARKED by functioning groups that meet @ NB don't
need to be 'claimed' as it already states whose it is & what it's for.
how long has word been out that a purge and reboot were happening? it was
made quite clear that "claimed" would be pretty dang near in meaning to
"removed from the space by an owner or steward" and not merely "tagged and
left in a closet", not even the member shelves were spared. given that
notice, it's kind of a dick move to complain about the efforts of people
working to give our shared space a much needed deep cleaning and rewiring
while not actually contributing to that effort yourself. none of this is
coming out of nowhere.

> > Pompous answers
>
> > is not required or necessary
>
> calling people names on the list and telling people what is 'required' or
'necessary' is most UNEXCELLENT.
"pompous" isn't a name, it's an adjective and was used as such in the prior
message (and didn't you open this message with "bacon bits", a play on the
name of the person to whom you'd responded? did wes consent to being called
"bacon bits?")
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140702/adfad62b/attachment-0003.html>