[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposal take 2
setient at gmail.com
Wed Mar 12 23:26:16 UTC 2014
Rubin, I would suggest reading the meeting notes from the past few weeks.
There was some discussion about this specific case. If necessarily, I
will do a write up in a bit as to why. Anything can be doocratic but it
isn't necessarily the most excellent way of doing things.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think you are quite understanding it. Yes this can be
> doocracitcally done by the secretary but the secretary thought it might be
> a nice idea to pass it by the community and reach out to it before doing
> so. You know to make sure it was excellent.
> Tom, would you mind chiming in here and explaining the reasoning (we did
> this at the meeting a bunch but rubin no longer attends them and hasn't in
> quite some time).
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
>> Eyes up here buddy...
>> rubin at starset.net
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss