[Noisebridge-discuss] Tom refusing to solve problems

[Jake]

because they were in person, in irc, and sent-mail which i had not 
bothered to paste in.  Here is the last email I had sent to Tom, which 
went unanswered:

  Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:49:10 -0800 (PST)
  From: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
  To: Tom Lowenthal <me at tomlowenthal.com>
  Subject: Re: solving problems

  Hi Tom,

  Thank you for writing back.  I will probably be hanging around the house
  tomorrow, i live in Oakland.  Or we could meet up at noisebridge or
  anywhere, just let me know what times you prefer.

  If there are other people you are aware of who should participate in this
  discussion we should invite them too.

  -jake

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jeffrey Carl Faden wrote:

> Why didn't you include those repeated attempts?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>       Hannah,
>
>       once again I ask you to please read my emails before replying to them. You said:
>
>              2. Based on the email you forwarded, it looks like Tom was willing to meet with you to discuss this.  To me, that looks like Tom was replying
>             and being reasonable
>                 about why he disagreed with your proposal.  In short, the exact opposite of what you're claiming here.
> 
> 
> what I said was:
>
>             I replied to the attached email and got nothing in response. This is after REPEATED attempts to get you to talk about your objections
>             and seek a common ground, talk about friendly amendments, or any progress at all.
> 
> 
> do you understand why what you've said is inaccurate and misleading?
> 
> -jake
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> 
> 
> 
>