[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposal take 2

[Ronald Cotoni]

Rubin, I would suggest reading the meeting notes from the past few weeks.
 There was some discussion about this specific case.  If necessarily, I
will do a write up in a bit as to why.  Anything can be doocratic but it
isn't necessarily the most excellent way of doing things.


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think you are quite understanding it.  Yes this can be
> doocracitcally done by the secretary but the secretary thought it might be
> a nice idea to pass it by the community and reach out to it before doing
> so.  You know to make sure it was excellent.
>
> Tom, would you mind chiming in here and explaining the reasoning (we did
> this at the meeting a bunch but rubin no longer attends them and hasn't in
> quite some time).
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
>
>> Eyes up here buddy...
>>
>> http://0.starset.net/screenies/20140312160311-Selection.png
>>
>> --
>> Rubin
>> rubin at starset.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>



-- 
Ronald Cotoni
Systems Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140312/a57b0d46/attachment-0003.html>