[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge as "facility"

[Naomi Most]

I haven't been privy to this apparently private discussion, but I
would guess that openfly is arguing "hackerspace for hackers".

I think openfly believes that once you have a strong enough community
of Actual Hackers who care about the space and are there all the time,
"everything follows from that".

I believe this, too.  But how to get there.

It certainly doesn't just happen, and it certainly doesn't happen when
there's a large contingent of Actual Hackers who refuse to come to the
space until it's all fixed up somehow, by someone else.

--Naomi



On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/2/2014 3:56:13 PM, "openfly" <openfly@إرهاب.شبكة> wrote:
>>>2 Narcotics Use, 2.a Meth ,.b Heroin ,2.c Marijuana ,2.d Mushrooms ,2.e
>>> DMT ,2.f Angel Dust ,2.g PCP ,3.a Theft ,,3.b Sexual Assault, 3.e Loitering
>
> fly, your list of problems is a description of noisebridge NOW.
>
> so you're arguing that NB should STOP providing open ACCESS to the general
> public, as it does now?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss



-- 
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
+1-415-728-7490

skype: nthmost

http://twitter.com/nthmost