[Noisebridge-discuss] FCC part 15 rules
matthew.d.stone at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 16:40:21 UTC 2015
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com> wrote:
> The FCC requires certification for the entire product, including
> antenna and assembly. It's not just the module.
I understand this. Modules can be pre-certified, and if you use a
pre-certified module in your product (and follow its application notes)
your certification time and costs are much smaller AFAIK.
> They've not cracked down on a lot of small maker projects that don't
> do this, mostly because those maker projects aren't being idiots by
> blatantly flaunting the rules.
I'm not so sure about this. I think boards meant for development are
exempt, and I'm trying to find these rules in writing.
> But if you plan on selling it widely
> you have to get it certified.
> (You have to get things certified for non-wifi EMR anyway, so...)
> On 8 December 2015 at 08:16, Matt Stone <matthew.d.stone at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Does anyone know the official rules regarding when an intentional
> > device goes from needing modular approval to full certification?
> > For instance, SparkFun can sell this:
> > Obviously that isn't a complete system, and only has modular approval.
> > If I make a device based on it, at some point I need to get full
> > certification.
> > I'm trying to find and understand the line which causes that to happen,
> > ideally to make a device/system that doesn't cross that line to avoid
> > certification costs and time.
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Matt
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss