[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge should install a Solar System on the roof
hol at gaskill.com
hol at gaskill.com
Fri Dec 16 15:41:07 UTC 2016
single axis trackers are now the dominant type of racking in
utility-scale solar but I haven't seen them for rooftop. Look up
Nextracker or ATI for inspiration
On 2016-12-06 11:29, John Shutt wrote:
> Hey Jake & Kevin,
> I'm also way into this idea, and want to help. Taking it a step
> further, I think it would be great to have green roof elements as well
> as solar, and I'm willing to take the lead on that. That would help
> with stormwater, neighborhood ecology, and city air quality.
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Dec 6, 2016, at 3:07 AM, Kevin Schiesser <bfb at riseup.net> wrote:
>> Hi Jake,
>> I agree and would like to help. My interest is in learning about the
>> permitting process and installation.
>> I have wondered for a while if it makes sense to fix a few motors to
>> the mounting rack that tilt the panels such that they are as
>> orthogonal as possible to the sun throughout the day/year. Would a
>> motor control system would consume more energy than would be gained by
>> optimizing the panel efficiency?
>>> On 12/4/16 7:44 PM, Jake wrote:
>>> yeah but why wouldn't noisebridge install solar panels? it would be
>>> so easy on
>>> the flat roof.
>>> i think the first step would be to talk with the landlords and get
>>> to apply for a permit, then the next step would be to draw up a
>>> specific design
>>> for the system (including equipment choices and disconnect boxes and
>>> and racking) and then actually apply for the permit...
>>> the rest is hardware and we're already good at that.
>>>> On Sun, 4 Dec 2016, Josh Juran wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>>>>> I believe that the only reliable way to save the world from climate
>>>>> change is
>>>>> to definitively show that solar power (and other renewables) are
>>>>> cheaper, and
>>>>> since labor is 66% of solar installation costs it seems that
>>>>> training ourselves
>>>>> and others (and making good online documentation) is the most
>>>>> reasonable way to
>>>>> do that.
>>>> This is a useful output even if, in the end, Noisebridge doesn't
>>>> install solar panels.
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss