[Noisebridge-discuss] [Noisebridge-announce] Noisebridge Statement on Jacob Appelbaum

[Andrey Fedorov]

>
> Should either the vast majority of the claims turn out to be unfounded


Even if all of the first-hand accounts I've read are completely true (and I
believe they are), I do not see it as obviously justifying a ban from the
space.

So again: what claims and by what reasoning?

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Simon C. Ion <ion.simon.c at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06/11/2016 12:45 AM, Andrey Fedorov wrote:
> > Sure thing, Jim. I'll refrain from quoting Niemöller, and just say
> suppression
> > of discussion via emotional triggers is a really shallow rhetorical
> tactic.
> > I think we're better than that.
>
> Should either the vast majority of the claims turn out to be unfounded
> or -even worse- the whole thing turn out to likely be a coordinated
> smear campaign, I would hope that Noisebridge and others who have made
> denouncements would have the stones to make a *very* public apology.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20160611/dfab3413/attachment-0003.html>