[Rack] Requesting access to implement a suggestion I made on nb-discuss

[maestro]

# you don't need anyone's permission to do things @NB...

# the network is open and anyone can do things with it>>
# with the understanding of being excellent and not>>
# a troll.

# the openess of the tech @NB does present security>>
# issues yet encourages beings to learn about it and>>
# contribute to it/help maintain it in good stead...

# anyone can have access and passwd(s) on it...

# if ANY part of the system is blocking you this is an issue>>
# that must be addressed immediately...

# i haven't looked @ pony or minotaur but you should be able>>
# to get on both in fact there was a recent public request for more>>
# beings to help keep the system up and 'clean' and add cool shit>>
# to it...

# i have bcc'd someone on this & they may get back to you...

end comments


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:09 PM, D J Capelis <mail at capelis.dj> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I posted on the list about doing this:
>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-October/032926.html
> and so far people seem to think it's a good idea and I've heard no
> objections so I thought I'd poke this list.
>
> Can I get the appropriate access to the appropriate machines?  (I
> assume pony, but does some of this stuff live on minotar?  I was
> reading through the list archives and it seems like it might?)  I tend
> to like the username djc.  My ssh public key is posted on the wiki
> here: https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/User:Djcapelis
>
> Thanks,
> ~DJ
> _______________________________________________
> Rack mailing list
> Rack at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/rack
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/rack/attachments/20121010/ce0e8f97/attachment-0003.html>