[Rack] Fwd: /posting

[Andy Isaacson]

Joseph,

Sorry for the delays!

Posting to -discuss is automatically allowed for anyone subscribed to
the list.  Non-subscribers are held for moderator approval, and the
moderators generally add you to the "allowed nonsubscribers" list if you
are not a spambot. :)

Posting to -announce is always approved by a human moderator, and only
two or three people reliably review and approve messages.  We need to
keep it manual approval because even people who are very reliable
sometimes screw up and reply-to-list or otherwise spam the announce list
(which has well over a thousand subscribers).

So if the two people who frequently approve posts are traveling (like
this week) then mails to -announce might be delayed.

I've gone in and dealt with all the moderator items and will try to keep
a closer eye on it in the next days.

Sorry again,
-andy

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:50:28AM -0700, maestro wrote:
> Joseph I have forwarded your mail to noisebridge-rack as you see here. Two
> of the main idiots that have been talking smack & generally trolling the
> linux groups online are james sundquist and another I will not state here
> as there are measures being taken on them...
> You'll remember james s. trying to convince some it is a cron job.
> Enough said on their intelligence.
> Thank you for bringing this to our attention & your continued support...
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joseph Puig <jbpuig at sbcglobal.net>
> Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2014
> Subject: /posting
> To: maestro <maestro415 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Jim Stockford <jim at systemateka.com>
> 
> 
> 
> Maestro,
>      I'm also copying Jim on the issue in this reply.
>      Last week I sent the Linux Discussion Group meeting announcements out
> on Tuesday morning to both SF-LUG and Noisebridge.  The one to SF-LUG
> arrived within minutes, as usual, but the one to Noisebridge didn't show up
> until after the meeting was over, a day and a half later.  One time could
> be a fluke, perhaps a glitch with the mail server, as the traffic had
> seemed to be a bit light.  This week on Monday morning I sent out the
> notices, and again the e-mail promptly showed up on the SF-LUG list.  I
> have, as yet, to see anything from me show up on the Noisebridge-disgust
> list.  Their mail server, however, is apparently able to busily spew forth
> mess-sludges.
> 
>      With the meeting time having been stripped from the web page, list
> postings by people actively pleading for others to no longer attend, and
> now e-mail from me possibly being suppressed, am I missing some clue?  If
> all this is perhaps intentional, then the plan is working, as nobody is
> attending any longer.
> 
>      Since I already sent out the meeting announcement, to SF-LUG at least,
> I will be there tonight.  I can watch the mice run across the floor.
> 
> Joseph
> 
> ________________________________
> From: maestro <maestro415 at gmail.com>
> To: Joseph Puig <jbpuig at sbcglobal.net>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 6:10 PM
> Subject: /posting
> 
> So for example your posting comes through from sf-lug NOTHING nb-discuss
> and sf-lug has been in my case inbox since 10am....
> 
> 
> 
> Message ends
> ________________
> 
> --
> ~the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> *~the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear...*

> _______________________________________________
> Rack mailing list
> Rack at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/rack