[Noisebridge-discuss] Processing workshop scheduling

[Mitch Altman]

I'm also cool with either date.  And the format you suggest sounds really good.

Mitch.


-----------------
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:18:56 -0700
> From: rachel at xtreme.com
> To: dmolnar at eecs.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Processing workshop scheduling
> CC: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> 
> David Molnar wrote:
> > Scott Murray wrote:
> >> Hi, all,
> >>
> >> I won't be able to attend tomorrow's meeting, but would like to run 
> >> two things past the group.
> >>
> >> First, I'd like to pick a day for the Processing workshop.  I'd like 
> >> to propose either 9/13 or 9/20.  Do people have a preference?
> > 
> > Either date is fine with me.
> 
> Ditto
> > 
> > 
> >> Second, I'd like to propose a format.  I think an all-day session 
> >> would be too long, but 2-3 hours is reasonable.  But I'd love to spend 
> >> more time with people who get into it, so what about this:  Let's 
> >> schedule 2 hours as direct teaching, followed by a break, and 2 hours 
> >> of open workshop time for people who can/want to stick around and work 
> >> on their projects.  I would stick around and could give more 
> >> individual attention during the second half.  How do people feel about 
> >> this approach?
> > 
> > The format sounds great. Two hours is about the limit for me for sitting 
> > and working on anything.
> 
> Ditto
> 
> > 
> > -David Molnar
> > 
> 
> Rachel AKA Broken Record
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20080819/52b1841b/attachment-0003.html>