[Noisebridge-discuss] Processing workshop scheduling
maltman23 at hotmail.com
Tue Aug 19 14:10:40 UTC 2008
I'm also cool with either date. And the format you suggest sounds really good.
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:18:56 -0700
> From: rachel at xtreme.com
> To: dmolnar at eecs.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Processing workshop scheduling
> CC: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> David Molnar wrote:
> > Scott Murray wrote:
> >> Hi, all,
> >> I won't be able to attend tomorrow's meeting, but would like to run
> >> two things past the group.
> >> First, I'd like to pick a day for the Processing workshop. I'd like
> >> to propose either 9/13 or 9/20. Do people have a preference?
> > Either date is fine with me.
> >> Second, I'd like to propose a format. I think an all-day session
> >> would be too long, but 2-3 hours is reasonable. But I'd love to spend
> >> more time with people who get into it, so what about this: Let's
> >> schedule 2 hours as direct teaching, followed by a break, and 2 hours
> >> of open workshop time for people who can/want to stick around and work
> >> on their projects. I would stick around and could give more
> >> individual attention during the second half. How do people feel about
> >> this approach?
> > The format sounds great. Two hours is about the limit for me for sitting
> > and working on anything.
> > -David Molnar
> Rachel AKA Broken Record
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss