[Noisebridge-discuss] On Cameras

[David Molnar]

Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Alex Perez wrote:
>> Speaking of which, have we ever considered mounting a low-lux B&W camera
>> up high overlooking the alleyway? For insurance reasons, this would
>> majorly cover our ass if we were ever robbed, and it may or may not
>> discourage aggregate crackhead behavior in the immediate vicinity. I am
>> sure someone will have an objection to this, but it's hard to argue that
>> crackhead-alley is low-crime.
> 
> Yes. We have considered this. For insurance reasons, I'm unconvinced
> that it would be helpful to have a camera. In addition, there are

For what it is worth, the insurance agents I have spoken with have
talked about a central station alarm system (e.g. ADT) as a precondition
for theft insurance. They have not specifically mentioned whether a
camera would make a difference in our coverage or premiums.

-David Molnar

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20081117/8f49945a/attachment-0003.sig>