[Noisebridge-discuss] 2169 Mission status

[Christie Dudley]

Hm.  I suppose that'll do if we can't find something at auction
closer.  I'll still keep an eye out for property disposal auctions and
see what we can get that way.  In most of these, you're bidding
against the scrap market and not people who are going to use them.

Christie

---
 Disrupting paradigms since 1967



On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM, d p chang<weasel at meer.net> wrote:
> d p chang <weasel at meer.net> writes:
>
>> jim <jim at well.com> writes:
>>
>>> * where some have used the word "kitchen", there is
>>> some agreement to purchase a used stainless steel
>>> combination dual sink and counter unit. my
>>> inexperienced guess is about $1000 (seems a little
>>> high to me, do others know better?) for the unit.
>>
>> there's a 'salvage' place on folsom (just before 22nd) that has stacks
>> (literally) of industrial kitchen suply-ish stuff like this.
>
> conveniently, right at the loading dock there were sinks on either side.
>
> the first picture is one w/ 3 'bowls' (only one robinet thingee) and the
> counter is 'long' (easily 10') and has a lip the whole way around.
>
>  http://xenon.stanford.edu/~pchang/up-20090721-000.JPG
>
> the second picture is two stacked on top of each other. neither had any
> fixtures (i suddenly cannot recall the word in english for the robinet
> thingees), but have drain pipes.
>
>  - the one on top is two equally sized bowls and the counter doesn't
>    have a lip. total length might be 7'.
>
>  - the bottom one has multiple assymetric bowls and the counter has a
>    lip.
>
>  http://xenon.stanford.edu/~pchang/up-20090721-001.JPG
>
> they had some more in back but i didn't wander around the whole lot. the
> guy there gave a range of 350-750. the smaller double bowl would go for
> a little more than 400. he didn't have a new price but mumbled something
> that made jim's guess of ~1k seem close.
>
> \p
> ---
> I am sorry to say that there is too much point to the wisecrack that
> life is extinct on other planets because their scientists were more
> advanced than ours. - John F. Kennedy
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>