[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus process

[Rachel McConnell]

https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Consensus_Process

There has been some excellent discussion on IRC about what to say, and
whether to say anything at all.  Currently I'd like to keep this very
vague and guideline-y, unless we all consense to have a more formal process.

Rachel

mark burdett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Mitch Altman<maltman23 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> It probably would be a good thing to have our Noisebridge consensus process
>> spelled out on our website!  Anyone want to take a crack at it?
>>
>> One thing that could also be good is for the facilitator to have a very
>> brief statement about our consensus decision-making process at the beginning
>> of each meeting, along with "What Noisebridge is about" (as I did last week
>> when I facilitated the meeting).
> 
> Kill Radio, a long-lived collective project in LA has done a good job
> with developing consensus process and training.  In fact they require
> new members to go thru consensus training before joining (so they have
> to run the trainings regularly, once a month after the general
> meeting).
> 
> The Kill Radio docs are available at http://www.killradio.org/doc/
> (not sure what the license is but I can't imagine they'd mind if
> NoiseBridge borrowed some verbage :)
> 
> --mark
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss