albill at openbuddha.com
Mon Jun 1 23:37:17 UTC 2009
On 6/1/09 4:33 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> A list of 150-200 people who may have a key is probably not useful to
> Noisebridge. I bet more than a number of members would be doubleplus
> unhappy about such a list, myself included. It has a chilling effect
> without much of a return, I think.
> Do we really need a list of names to tell us that any crackhead on the
> street can bump that lock with a rubber mallet?
> Really, I think the concern is valid but attempted control of the keys
> seems to accomplish very little...
Well, for a while we were talking about putting it an electronic lock
system or replacing the locks. When keys were first handed out, I do
know that none of us expected that we'd be using the same keys and locks
eight months later.
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss