[Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers: ExCEL Request for Proposals 2009-2010]

[Mitch Altman]

Hi J.D.,

 

Thanks.  Your input will be welcome.

 

Non-members are always welcome at Noisebridge, especially if they are also excellent people!  :)

 

Thanks,

Mitch.

 


 


CC: michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com; noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
From: zamfire at gmail.com
To: maltman23 at hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers: ExCEL Request for Proposals 2009-2010]
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:59:37 -0700

Hi all,


I'd be interested to participate in this planning session - I've done a lot of teaching before, but never in this kind of environment, so I'm not sure how much I'd be able to contribute. I could make it at 6:30 tomorrow, but wouldn't want someone else to miss it on my account (see aforementioned caveat).


Hoping this doesn't matter, but I'm not a noisebridge member (yet!) -- however I have been by 83c a few times at this point and you seem like excellent people!


J.D.





On Mar 29, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Mitch Altman wrote:

Yay!
 
 
The "proposal" at this point is only a collection of thoughts.  Do you have something more complete already?  Should we (everyone interested in participating) get together to talk in person and put an outline together?
 
 
I'm super busy getting four projects together this week (!) but my schedule is almost all flexible, and I can make time whenever is good for others.
 
 
I'll make two suggestions for a time/place to get together:
     Monday (tomorrow) at 3pm at Noisebridge
     Monday (tomorrow) at 6:30pm at Noisebridge
If anyone interested can/can't make either of the above, please say so and/or suggest another place/time.
 
 
Best,
 
Mitch.
 
 

 
-----------------------
 
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:28:01 -0700
> From: michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
> To: maltman23 at hotmail.com
> CC: danielast at gmail.com; noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers: ExCEL Request for Proposals 2009-2010]
> 
> Talked it over with my partner at TMTM, and we would love to 
> collaborate. Thanks for asking!
> 
> At what stage is the proposal?
> 
> Michael
> 
> Mitch Altman wrote:
> > Yeah, Michael, if it's cool by you to collaborate, then I'd love to do 
> > that. I enjoyed working together with you at ETech and at the school 
> > with the MAKE Mobile. I'd like to do more. :)
> > 
> > 
> > Let me know your thoughts.
> > 
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Mitch.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:23:56 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers: ExCEL 
> > Request for Proposals 2009-2010]
> > From: danielast at gmail.com
> > To: michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
> > CC: maltman23 at hotmail.com; noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > 
> > I think that is great that you are able to collaborate! As I told 
> > Mitch, I wish I could do that too but I cannot work for free! I am happy 
> > to give input and to have teaching discussions!
> > 
> > However my programs are very different than what you guys do, so i 
> > don't think that duplication or cross overs is a problem in my case.
> > 
> > D
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Michael Shiloh 
> > <michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com <mailto:michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Mitch Altman wrote:
> > 
> > I wouldn't want you to unsubscribe, Michael.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Is there some way we can collaborate on what we're bidding?
> > 
> > 
> > Yeah, I was wondering that myself. I guess my default behavior is to
> > bother other people as little as possible, to see what they are
> > doing, and then do something else.
> > 
> > We can either collaborate on the bid, or at the very least,
> > coordinate our bids so that we avoid duplication.
> > 
> > I'm a little torn - since teaching is now my only income, I do feel
> > a need to develop our own teaching reputation and to publicize the
> > name of our organization (Teach me to make) as much as possible. On
> > the other hand, by pooling our resources, we probably end up with a
> > whole that is greater than the sum of the parts.
> > 
> > On the other-other hand, collaboration is ethically and socially of
> > higher value. It's just the right thing to do. So I think I'd rather
> > go this way.
> > 
> > Let me think on this a minute to make sure I haven't overlooked
> > anything.
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > www.danielast.com <http://www.danielast.com/>

_______________________________________________
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20090329/13d4dc2c/attachment-0003.html>