[Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers: ExCEL Request for Proposals 2009-2010]

[J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira]

Hi all,

I'd be interested to participate in this planning session - I've done  
a lot of teaching before, but never in this kind of environment, so  
I'm not sure how much I'd be able to contribute. I could make it at  
6:30 tomorrow, but wouldn't want someone else to miss it on my account  
(see aforementioned caveat).

Hoping this doesn't matter, but I'm not a noisebridge member (yet!) --  
however I have been by 83c a few times at this point and you seem like  
excellent people!

J.D.


On Mar 29, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Mitch Altman wrote:

> Yay!
>
>
> The "proposal" at this point is only a collection of thoughts.  Do  
> you have something more complete already?  Should we (everyone  
> interested in participating) get together to talk in person and put  
> an outline together?
>
>
> I'm super busy getting four projects together this week (!) but my  
> schedule is almost all flexible, and I can make time whenever is  
> good for others.
>
>
> I'll make two suggestions for a time/place to get together:
>      Monday (tomorrow) at 3pm at Noisebridge
>      Monday (tomorrow) at 6:30pm at Noisebridge
> If anyone interested can/can't make either of the above, please say  
> so and/or suggest another place/time.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Mitch.
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------
>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:28:01 -0700
> > From: michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
> > To: maltman23 at hotmail.com
> > CC: danielast at gmail.com; noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers:  
> ExCEL Request for Proposals 2009-2010]
> >
> > Talked it over with my partner at TMTM, and we would love to
> > collaborate. Thanks for asking!
> >
> > At what stage is the proposal?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Mitch Altman wrote:
> > > Yeah, Michael, if it's cool by you to collaborate, then I'd love  
> to do
> > > that. I enjoyed working together with you at ETech and at the  
> school
> > > with the MAKE Mobile. I'd like to do more. :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Let me know your thoughts.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Mitch.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:23:56 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] FW: [Fwd: FW from Eva Meyers:  
> ExCEL
> > > Request for Proposals 2009-2010]
> > > From: danielast at gmail.com
> > > To: michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
> > > CC: maltman23 at hotmail.com; noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > >
> > > I think that is great that you are able to collaborate! As I told
> > > Mitch, I wish I could do that too but I cannot work for free! I  
> am happy
> > > to give input and to have teaching discussions!
> > >
> > > However my programs are very different than what you guys do, so i
> > > don't think that duplication or cross overs is a problem in my  
> case.
> > >
> > > D
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Michael Shiloh
> > > <michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com  
> <mailto:michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mitch Altman wrote:
> > >
> > > I wouldn't want you to unsubscribe, Michael.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there some way we can collaborate on what we're bidding?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, I was wondering that myself. I guess my default behavior  
> is to
> > > bother other people as little as possible, to see what they are
> > > doing, and then do something else.
> > >
> > > We can either collaborate on the bid, or at the very least,
> > > coordinate our bids so that we avoid duplication.
> > >
> > > I'm a little torn - since teaching is now my only income, I do  
> feel
> > > a need to develop our own teaching reputation and to publicize the
> > > name of our organization (Teach me to make) as much as possible.  
> On
> > > the other hand, by pooling our resources, we probably end up  
> with a
> > > whole that is greater than the sum of the parts.
> > >
> > > On the other-other hand, collaboration is ethically and socially  
> of
> > > higher value. It's just the right thing to do. So I think I'd  
> rather
> > > go this way.
> > >
> > > Let me think on this a minute to make sure I haven't overlooked
> > > anything.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > > <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > www.danielast.com <http://www.danielast.com/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20090329/816283da/attachment-0003.html>