[Noisebridge-discuss] non-excellent couch behavior

[Naomi Most]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Rich Gibson <rich.gibson at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am confused.  Why should people who want to undo have primacy?
>


Isn't that exactly how NB implements consensus?

--Naomi



>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:13 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Heh, I can't condone adding another RULE, but I do think that it's a
> > good description of excellence.  So we have:
> >
> > A) It is excellent to DO things
> > B) If your doing is undone, it is excellent to then seek the dreaded
> > trial of Talking To Other People.
> >
> > Can we handle that, nerds?
> >
> > -K
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sai Emrys <noisebridge at saizai.com>
> > wrote:
> >> From an offlist conversation, since it seems of  general relevance:
> >>
> >> I think it might be pointful to have a "1 revert rule" policy.
> >> Someone
> >> can do X, someone else can undo it, the first someone shouldn't redo
> >> it without consultation.
> >>
> >> This would help ensure that if people have a disagreement over what
> >> should be done, it's solved by discussion rather than attrition.
> >>
> >> - Sai
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
Naomi Theora Most
naomi at nthmost.com
+1-415-728-7490

skype: nthmost

http://twitter.com/nthmost
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20091114/97ff69fa/attachment-0003.html>