[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus and the "old ways".

[Christopher Nielsen]

I have no interest in kicking anyone out. I don't see consensus as
poisonous, but I do see the whining as poisonous. Reasoned discussion is
definitely welcome, but I am seeing a lot of name calling, which is
unproductive. Come to the table with an open mind and possible solutions
instead of just complaining that it's broken. As has been mentioned, if you
don't like the way Noisebridge operates, there are other hacker spaces. No
one is forcing you to be a part of Noisebridge.

On Oct 2, 2009 6:42 PM, "Crutcher Dunnavant" <crutcher at gmail.com> wrote:

This seems to be telling me: if you disagree, leave.
While that sounds like a very effective decision making process, it isn't
one that sounds very appealing.

I'm a member of NB for the people, mostly, and for the tools as a distant
second. I participate despite what I view as a poisonous consensus process.
If you want to kick me out, I guess you'll need consensus.

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:15 PM, madhatter <m4dh4tt3r at gmail.com> wrote: > >
If you don't consent, t...
-- 

Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20091002/413fe737/attachment-0003.html>