[Noisebridge-discuss] how to deal with abandoned beverage containers
Michael Shiloh
michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 18 22:18:37 UTC 2009
and thanks for your reply.
seems a good compromise and balance of effort vs. ease of cleaning.
i'm happy.
m
jim wrote:
> thanks for the reply. i think we should put some more
> effort into systems to make cleaning easier, but not a
> lot more--there's a reasonable limit that we haven't yet
> reached.
> as to the drink disposal container experiment, i
> think it's a right move and wasn't much work to do.
> refuse categories seem to be
> * partially full beverage containers
> * food and compostables
> * recyclables
> * black-bin garbage
> seems worth making sure we have simple systems in
> place for those categories and don't get more fine-
> grained.
> we should improve our cleaning systems, too: keep
> 'em few and simple--brooms and vacuums, mops and
> buckets, rags and soaps and sponges, all in some
> designated place.
> tools and resources in their places.
> to-hack stuff in its place and regular weeding to
> recategorize as e-waste.
> finance.
>
> the above seems close to the whole list of stuff to
> manage so our hacker space works.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 14:39 -0700, Michael Shiloh wrote:
>> jim wrote:
>>> i disagree.
>> and i would defend your right to disagree!
>>
>>> the idea is to make it simple for people to clean
>>> up. there's a problem with cups, cans, and bottles
>>> that have liquids in them: disposing of them requires
>>> a walk to a sink
>> true, in general, but there is a sink easily accessible in the large
>> room. if the sink required a walk down the stairs, perhaps that would be
>> different.
>>
>> to me it's not black-and-white. it's all a matter of degree. hence the
>> friendly reminders, and not being shot on first transgression. if i saw
>> christie looking for her drink, i might politely say "i think you left
>> it over there, where we were discussing the thrust necessary to put a
>> pig into orbit..."
>>
>> i think you having to think about, acquire, and bring in the containers
>> is an effort that must be weighed relative to the effort needed to avoid
>> it in the first place.
>>
>>
>>> make it easy to clean and more people will do it.
>>>
>>
>> very true. but there is a limit. you know it won't end with the messy
>> cups and burritos. do you want to spend all your time setting up systems
>> to make it easy for people to clean up? do you think there is an end to
>> this? the answer is no. at some point you have to put some of the
>> responsibility back in the hands of those responsible. and by my
>> measure, that point (in this particular topic) has been arrived at and
>> passed.
>>
>> YMMV
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list