[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Executive Director

[aestetix aestetix]

Now that it has hit the mailing list, a lot of people are going to be aware
of the "issue."

Would someone politely explain what the purpose of Executive Director is,
without citing any legalese, and while keeping in mind to be excellent to
everyone else? I'm not asking what the "law" says the purpose is, I'm asking
to clarify why Noisebridge needs one.

This is really important to keep in mind to prevent this process from
becoming something it's not and shouldn't be.

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, the end of the food chain
<jg at monochrom.at>wrote:

> sounds like undeadlock.
>
>
> On 27.02.2010, at 13:37, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >   wait a second. what do the bylaws say about
> > running members over?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 13:05 -0800, Zedd Epstein wrote:
> >> There was only one person that blocked. She is not willing to change
> >> her position for the good of the organization as a whole, and our
> >> version of consensus doesn't allow us to just run her over. Therefore
> >> the only recourse we have is to find someone else that we can all
> >> agree on.
> >>
> >> Zedd
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100227/73c24fd6/attachment-0003.html>