[Noisebridge-discuss] [drama] New logo source?

[Josh Myer]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com> wrote:

> Excerpts from Rachel McConnell's message of Tue Jan 12 17:12:45 -0800 2010:
> > Of course there'd have to be a naming convention for images that are
> logos.
>
> Or a form or email to some person/script-bot that will make the symlink
> for you. I'm sure there are images in the "uploaded images" directory
> that shouldn't also be logos.
>
>
At that point, the logo process on the wiki that we run on our own hardware
(and own the entire stack) of is less "open to submission" than the calendar
that only Google runs, insofar as there are literally dozens of people who
can administer the calendar (including adding new admins)!  I find this
incredibly ironic.

In any case, could we maybe just go back to having only one logo up there at
a time?  It seems to me to make way more sense, but maybe I'm just unhep to
this ideologic jive (, daddyo).
-- 
Josh Myer 650.248.3796
josh at joshisanerd.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100112/f2fb4125/attachment-0003.html>