[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Calendar

[Shannon Lee]

Consensus is a decision making process, not a rule-making process; if we
wanted a rule-making and/or rule-keeping process we'd have to consense on
one.  Or, more likely, someone would have to build one, and then we'd have
to bicker over whether that was OK, and whether we wanted one at all and if
we did, how it would be different from the one someone had built, but while
we were bickering a bunch of new people would join, assuming that the
rule-keeping-mechanism was official, and they'd be upset and confused by our
trying to take away the rules or claim that they somehow didn't count for
obscure and confusing reasons, and besides these rules seem not to have been
maintained in a while, why don't we migrate over to Google Governance?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:

> >   if possible, add to the note on google calendar
> > that the official events list on the main page of
> > the noisebridge wiki is the real schedule.
>
> Um, you know, I feel like all of those terms are meaningless.  I agree
> that the google cal is "unofficial" and that the wiki is somehow more
> "authoritative", but even that is relative to the general level of
> authority that anything has at noisebridge.  The only real form of
> authority we have is consensus, and I don't know that we've ever
> officially consensed on this.  Is there a list of past consenses
> somewhere on the wiki?
>
> Anyway, you can edit the google cal, so do whatever you want.  If
> anyone else wants to edit it, anyone who's currently able to edit it
> can invite anyone else.  That includes myself and several others
> participating in this discussion.
>
> In any case, I definitely think we need a single set of events.
> Currently we have... 2-6, I would say.  Events are posted in one but
> not necessarily all of the following venues: The list of recurring
> events on the wiki, the list of one-time events on the wiki, the
> google cal, the discuss list, and the announce list.  And sometimes
> they're not posted at all.  Sometimes unposted events are private,
> sometimes they're intended to be public, and just aren't publicized.
>
> I think it would be nice to have a single insertion point for events
> that then populates whatever access methods we need and automates all
> of the above venues, and then say that whoever bothers to do that
> single scheduling task has priority claim to space when the time
> comes.
>
> -K
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >   if possible, add to the note on google calendar
> > that the official events list on the main page of
> > the noisebridge wiki is the real schedule.
> >   i'm in favor of either abandoning the google
> > calendar or making it more general, to indicate
> > what kinds of things are happening in what areas
> > and when. best that we clearly point to a single
> > place of solid information, which seems to me to
> > be the events list on the NB front page.
> >   i just looked at the NB event list on the front
> > page and can't figure out what you mean by the
> > kenyu calendar extension: is there some link to
> > click or what?
> >   as to the organization of the wiki in general,
> > thank you, thank you to those who've put in work
> > on this. i wish there were an improvement in
> > hierarchical (taxonomic) navigation.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 00:46 -0800, Kelly wrote:
> >> What did you think of the Kenyu calendar extension?  Lee linked to it.
> >> It looks nice.  I like the idea of full mediawiki integration.
> >>
> >> The only possible issue is that I really think having a dropdown for
> >> room name would be super awesome.  Tonight we had 3 classes booked
> >> into 2 rooms.  Partly this is because sometimes events are coordinated
> >> by non-members, listed in multiple places, and there's no official
> >> method for "booking" Noisebridge.  To some degree I like this, but I
> >> do feel like we should improve the process a little bit.
> >>
> >> -Kelly
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ian Atha <thatha at thatha.org> wrote:
> >> > I looked at some existing opensource solutions and none of it seems to
> do
> >> > what we want it to. I am writing a plugin that will parse a spceially
> >> > formated page stored on the existing Wiki and will generate an iCal
> feed.
> >> >
> >> > On Jan 20, 2010 5:46 PM, "Ani Niow" <v at oneletterwonder.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I hear Jason Dusek and some other people were going to start a
> committee to
> >> > determine the best way to transfer ownership of the site and
> everything with
> >> > it over to Noisebridge's control so we can do stuff like this if we
> want.
> >> > May want to talk to him about this...
> >> >
> >> > -Ani
> >> >
> >> > 2010/1/20 Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> >> > I feel this is not a good sign. > > Oh come on guys. > > On Tue,
> Jan 19,
> >> >> > 2010 at 2:58 PM, Kelly...
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
Shannon Lee
(503) 539-3700

"Any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100121/a26dd263/attachment-0003.html>