[Noisebridge-discuss] Practical Politics

[Jared Dunne]

re: Rachel H's comment re: Jim's observation:
*slow clap* My feelings exactly.  While we might end up coming up with
concrete ways to change the process itself.  I think the major change
will come from how we as individuals approach the process.

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM, rachel lyra hospodar
<rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:
> Re: jim's observations about talking vs remembering
>
> It's hard to know, in our sprawling cultural biome, how to convey
> information, via sign, wiki, email, talking, etc. So many options! I think
> that in this case the goal should be for many of us to be well-versed in
> what Consensus means and how we have agreed to enact it. Ideally there would
> be someone or several someones at Every Meeting who is well versed in how
> this works.  Some things around the space are kind of institutional
> knowledge held by one person - you have to track down x person to find out
> about y thing in z corner. I think that part of fixing the consensus process
> in our community is creating a shared community knowledge of how the process
> works - and a shared commitment to trying to make it work. Without that
> last, there's no reason to try.  I think that commitment is part of the duty
> of membership.
>
> mediumreality.com
>
> On Feb 2, 2011 9:56 AM, "jim" <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>