[Noisebridge-discuss] Meeting Minutes

[Just Duncan]

*"*Be it the consensus of Noisebridge that the issue of banning Rob 2.0
(a.k.a. Dank) be deferred *until either he or his advocate Mitch or Kelly,
gives fair notice and attends a meeting."

*This is confusing and I think may be missing a verb... what exactly are the
A/B/C alternatives for him to choose from and the corresponding resulting
expected outcomes?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Tom <noisebridge at flamsmark.com> wrote:

> The minutes from yesterday's meeting have been posted at:
> <https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2011_10_11<https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2011_10_11>
> >
>
> Highlights
> --------------
> - We have started a **Friends of Noisebridge** wall where you should put a
> photo and some info about you to help welcome new folks to the space.
> - We have ***21486.50*** ducats in our bucket, and have not touched the
> reserve $15000 in over a month.
> - Dan Cote is a new member. Congrats Dan! Please pay your dues.
> - It is the consensus of Noisebridge to spend a net sum of $1000 for a
> contractor to retrofit our lighting for efficiency.
> - We reached consensus regarding how to deal with Rob 2.0:
>
>> Be it the consensus of Noisebridge that the issue of banning Rob 2.0
>> (a.k.a. Dank) be deferred until either he or his advocate Mitch or Kelly,
>> gives fair notice and attends a meeting. Until that time he is unwelcome at
>> Noisebridge.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20111014/2c73978b/attachment-0003.html>