[Noisebridge-discuss] Meeting Minutes

[rachel lyra hospodar]

Duncan, you were at that meeting, initially as Rob's advocate. You left the
meeting after I disputed your version of the previous night's events, and
while you stayed in the space did not participate in the rest of the meeting
or the discussion that fine-tuned this consensus item.  Why then would you
feel it reasonable to nitpick its wording now?

If Rob is curious what his options are or how to proceed he can contact
either mitch or kelly. If he needs their contact information we can get it
to him. The pertinent information for ALL to know is that, UNTIL Rob enters
a process of communication and mediation, he is unwelcome in the space.

I ask everyone's help in ejecting him if he shows up and trying to get a
picture of him to help others identify him.

R.

mediumreality.com
On Oct 14, 2011 1:17 PM, "Just Duncan" <justduncan at gmail.com> wrote:

> *"*Be it the consensus of Noisebridge that the issue of banning Rob 2.0
> (a.k.a. Dank) be deferred *until either he or his advocate Mitch or Kelly,
> gives fair notice and attends a meeting."
>
> *This is confusing and I think may be missing a verb... what exactly are
> the A/B/C alternatives for him to choose from and the corresponding
> resulting expected outcomes?
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Tom <noisebridge at flamsmark.com> wrote:
>
>> The minutes from yesterday's meeting have been posted at:
>> <https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2011_10_11<https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2011_10_11>
>> >
>>
>> Highlights
>> --------------
>> - We have started a **Friends of Noisebridge** wall where you should put
>> a photo and some info about you to help welcome new folks to the space.
>> - We have ***21486.50*** ducats in our bucket, and have not touched the
>> reserve $15000 in over a month.
>> - Dan Cote is a new member. Congrats Dan! Please pay your dues.
>> - It is the consensus of Noisebridge to spend a net sum of $1000 for a
>> contractor to retrofit our lighting for efficiency.
>> - We reached consensus regarding how to deal with Rob 2.0:
>>
>>> Be it the consensus of Noisebridge that the issue of banning Rob 2.0
>>> (a.k.a. Dank) be deferred until either he or his advocate Mitch or Kelly,
>>> gives fair notice and attends a meeting. Until that time he is unwelcome at
>>> Noisebridge.
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20111014/ec302ff2/attachment-0003.html>