[Noisebridge-discuss] Rob 2.0 Update

[Kelly]

FWIW, when he and I discussed it, Rob 2.0 seemed clear on what
"unwelcome at noisebridge" meant. I think that maybe Duncan was less
clear on it.

-K

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 19:45, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> Are people okay with someone repeatedly making threats against
> noisebridge?  I'm not.
>
> I mentioned at the meeting (at which it was decided Rob 2.0 was unwelcome
> in the space) that he had made threats, including that he would return and
> take as much hardware as he felt had been taken from him, and that he
> would "shut down this place".  I'm sure people have heard him make such
> threats before.  And below, i've quoted Kelly on the threats he made to
> her today, WHILE she was offering to be his advocate to stay in the space.
>
> I realize that people are uncomfortable banning a person without that
> person being invited to a meeting, but at this point this person has been
> invited to a meeting and even invited to attend a meeting by proxy through
> mitch or kelly.
>
> Since contact has been made by one of those mediators, I believe that with
> or without Rob 2.0's cooperation, we should be able to proceed with the
> discussion about whether he should be banned from the space at the next
> meeting.
>
> Whether we do or not, i think we need to clarify the meaning of "Rob 2.0
> is unwelcome at Noisebridge".
>
> Also I will point out that he apparently wasted several person-hours today
> alone with his bullshit, and I think our time could be better spent
> hacking than on coddling an uncooperative, threatening, douchebag.
>
> -jake
>
> Kelly said:
>
>> included in this were his claim that Rubin stole the speakers that he
>> donated to Noisebridge and the fact that he witnessed people building a
>> bomb at Noisebridge and stopped them. At some points, Rob 2.0 said that
>> he "could" pursue legal action regarding the servers or call a
>> government security organization over the bomb incident. When I pointed
>> out that these were threats, Rob 2.0 denied that that was the case and
>> said that he wouldn't stoop to that behavior. This is the
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>