[Noisebridge-discuss] Rob 2.0 Update

[Kelly]

Thanks John. It's helpful to hear your perspective. It's always ok if
you don't feel comfortable personally confronting someone in the
space. The important thing is to not let unacceptable behavior pass
because you're not comfortable personally confronting it. In that
situation you should be sure to alert other concerned NB members who
may be willing to do the confronting part. Which is exactly what you
did. So thanks!

-Kelly

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 15:11, John Ellis <neurofog at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kelly,
>
> Rob 2.0 and I have had at least one exchange suggesting that if he
> wishes to troll/annoy etc. then GTFO, this was before formal
> consensus. I didn't wish to escalate the conflict given the history
> with Rob 2.0, or get into a long discussion regarding banned vs "Not
> Welcome". This is not to say I disagree with the formal consensus on
> this.
>
> I welcome Mitch and your attempt at mediation. From what I understand,
> part of the reason certain people have been suggested to leave, is
> their unwillingness to change their behavior to fit community norms at
> NoiseBridge.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:
>> FWIW, when he and I discussed it, Rob 2.0 seemed clear on what
>> "unwelcome at noisebridge" meant. I think that maybe Duncan was less
>> clear on it.
>>
>> -K
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>