[Noisebridge-discuss] A modest proposal.

[Ronald Cotoni]

I like Kelly's solution to this problem.  The biggest problem I see is
doing nothing at all and people blocking it for silly and illogical
reasons.  I also like the idea of a member or a trusted person being
responsible for a guest.  The way I see it is if we want a 24/7 space it is
a great thing.  With all great things, come great responsibility and we are
avoiding that.

What I would suggest is temporarily closing at night until we implement
something better than what is going on now(nothing).  We could vote every
week on it.  This way Nosebridge is a safer drama free place for now and
will hopefully motivate the "No members hours" people to get going.

Please be aware I am not a member and would most likely be affected by
Nosebridge not being open at night.


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Wladyslaw Zbikowski <
embeddedlinuxguy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Guys, I don't know if you're all unaware of this, but a number of
> people who chronically use Noisebridge for not-hacking already have
> the damn keys.
>
> I propose a simple question as shibboleth: "Do you want to hack?"
> Those who answer rightly may pass.
>
> What's the point of securing the door without a clear criterion of who
> belongs on which side?
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:43 PM, tedward <arbzed at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Proposal:
> >>
> >> After a certain time in the evening, the buzzer is automatically
> disabled.
> >>  If you want to access the space after that time, you need to either
> have a
> >> key (meaning presumably you have been around the community for a bit and
> >> gained someone's trust) or else interact via telephone with someone who
> is
> >> already inside and convince them to let you in (maybe this person has to
> >> actually walk downstairs to open the door).  It seems to me that this
> would
> >> satisfy our minimal trust criteria without greatly altering the
> >> space's accessibility for users who don't intent to burgle, assault, or
> >> inhabit.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shannon Lee
> > (503) 539-3700
> >
> > "Any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science."
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
Ronald Cotoni
Systems Engineer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20120209/350eb630/attachment-0003.html>