[Noisebridge-discuss] This non-free social networking for Occupy = not hacker friendly ????

John Ellis neurofog at gmail.com
Thu Jan 5 20:32:08 UTC 2012


Disclaimer: I am not a buddypress expert.

Why not use BuddyPress? GPL Software... not corporate like Ning.com

-John

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva <
pitanga at members.fsf.org> wrote:

> On 5 January 2012 12:59, Corey McGuire <coreyfro at coreyfro.com> wrote:
> > I think the point isn't occupy being hacker friendly.  That's irrelevant.
> > The point is, "do we want some body of people having control over
> occupy's
> > data?"  To which, the answer is, "Hackers can save the day."
> >
> > My question is, is this sight run on occupii's own hardware or at least
> own
> > data structure.  So long as their database is their own and can be
> archived
> > to their heart's content, what ever solution works is fine.
>
> If they don't have control over the software and hardware, the
> database being their own (whatever this means) or not is irrelevant.
> Well, then they don't control the network. We're doomed =P
>
> --
> Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva
>
> http://polignu.org
> http://garoa.net.br
> http://gnu.org/s/libredwg
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20120105/b89f9f23/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list