[Noisebridge-discuss] Let's Get Additional Bike Parking

miloh froggytoad at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 18:06:29 UTC 2012


The construction is 2 phase, caltrans or the city first to dig up the
street, then mta to think about possibly digging up the street again to
widen or narrow it.

Yup, I think street project access wont be ready until 2013, but i'll check
in with city planning to make sure.

-rma
On Oct 8, 2012 10:22 AM, "Mitch Altman" <maltman23 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Cool idea.  A parklet can be whatever we want it to be.  But I think we
> need to create a detailed proposal.  Miloh already put in a proposal to the
> City for Noisebridge for a parklet, but I don't know what it included.
>  Care to pipe in on this, Miloh?
>
> Having a library as part of a parklet proposes some challenges to keep the
> books from deteriorating due to weather.  We'll need to address those.
>
> Having bike parking AND a parklet seems like a great idea to me.
>
> Mitch.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:46:26 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Let's Get Additional Bike Parking
> > From: danny at spesh.com
> > To: rachelyra at gmail.com
> > CC: maltman23 at hotmail.com; noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net;
> sundquistjames at gmail.com
> >
> > So now that the roadworks are done on Mission, we might want to
> > revisit the parklet idea. I met a person from Ourshelves, who provide
> > libraries for shelters and other spaces in the mission, who is
> > interested in doing a library parklet, and might want to double-up
> > with us. A parklet would give us some bike parking space too, right?
> >
> > d.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:43 AM, rachel lyra hospodar
> > <rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Do you think if those of us who agreed this would be a good idea
> emailed
> > > that person individually, it would solve their doubt issue? Or just
> > > aggravate the people we are trying to convince to help us? A wiki page
> that
> > > works like a petition? Photographic evidence of the bikes locked to
> parking
> > > meters outside every day?
> > >
> > > Muni gave parisoma bike racks, at their old location. Our use patterns
> are
> > > larger, more consistent, and more full of bicycles. I think they just
> need
> > > us to prove we want it.
> > >
> > > On Oct 6, 2012 4:14 PM, "Mitch Altman" <maltman23 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Do you know how we show SFMTA that there is a "frequent demand on a
> daily
> > >> basis"?
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> > From: sundquistjames at gmail.com
> > >> > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 17:24:28 -0700
> > >> > To: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > >> > Subject: [Noisebridge-discuss] Let's Get Additional Bike Parking
> > >> >
> > >> > Hey,
> > >> >
> > >> > I formally requested simple "O" shaped bicycle racks be installed
> just
> > >> > outside of the space for when it fills up. I just got the following
> > >> > response. Please help me in gently assuring the Livable Streets
> > >> > Subdivision of Muni that we do need the parking outside.
> > >> >
> > >> > "Thank you for requesting bicycle parking at this location. The San
> > >> > Francisco Bicycle Coalition provides event bicycle parking. We
> provide
> > >> > bicycle parking at locations that have consistent and frequent
> demand
> > >> > on a near daily basis, therefore we do not recommend installing bike
> > >> > parking at this location."
> > >> > Ryan.Dodge at sfmta.com<mailto:Ryan.Dodge at sfmta.com>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________ Noisebridge-discuss
> > >> > mailing list Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > >> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20121008/821d99c3/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list