[Noisebridge-discuss] State of the dirty workshop
jim
jim at systemateka.com
Tue Jan 15 02:41:16 UTC 2013
Your take on my words is different from
my intent. Your labeled lockbox idea is a
good solution. Your reference to a sekert
klub strikes me as over-the-top per my
intent.
And I didn't want to suggest hiding all
sharp or dangerous objects. Just a few that
are both "exotic" and "dangerous", which is
to say, things that require some training
and can cause serious damage, like converting
flesh to mush.
On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 18:21 -0800, John Withers wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 13:17 -0800, jim wrote:
> > I told him to hide the routers and he seemed
> > surprised, then I think he got my point: don't make
> > really dangerous tools easily available to the
> > adventurous and inexperienced.
>
> This strikes me as a fabulously bad idea. Are we going to hide all the
> multi amp power supplies and every sharp object in NB as well?
>
> This creates a situation in which those of us who don't live in the
> dirty shop but use it for various things have no idea if something still
> exists or not. And since things do have a habit of disappearing, it is
> perfectly reasonable to assume, oh, someone stole all the routers and
> sold them for crack, there are no routers at NB.
>
> I really like the idea of getting a couple of lock boxes and labeling
> them. Thus, we know that something is actually there and it is just a
> matter of gaining access, so we need to ask around. I am willing to
> donate to this idea. But hiding tools so that no one who isn't in the
> sekrit club realizes we have them seems like really bad form.
>
> -j
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list