[Noisebridge-discuss] learning vs getting shit done
Daniel Pitts
Daniel at coloraura.com
Tue Jun 4 20:26:37 UTC 2013
Who was that directed at? Did you mean that to be a reply to my message?
If so, my response is that if I were a paying member, then I would be
able to afford to have the tools and materials at my home in lieu of
being a paying member. The benefit of being part of the Noisebridge
community would be what would sway me to be a member, not the
materials. As it stands, I'm mostly a lurker on this mailing list, and
rarely present at the space (I've been there twice).
To put it another way, the only reason I would pay to be a member would
be to have an environment to share my ideas and learn from others.
If I frequented the space as anything but a paying member, then I
personally would be doubly grateful for having a space and material to
work for free and people to socialize with.
As it stands, I do happen to do most of my hacking at home, because of
the disinterest I've observed within the space and on this list.
On 6/3/13 6:23 PM, Jeffrey Faden wrote:
> Really? You have all the tools and materials Noisebridge has at your home?
> Jeffrey
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Nicholas LoCicero
> <nick.locicero at gmail.com <mailto:nick.locicero at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I've been to several 12-step type spaces where they are very
> similar to Noisebridge in that they are entirely member funded,
> have no "professionals" running the place, etc. These places do
> much better selling coffee to their members than having an entire
> kitchen. I'd much rather see the kitchen go and have some
> cafe-coffee place like the one you suggest. Even if it's just pay
> what you can for self-serve, on your honor coffee. The idea works
> really well and the kitchen really pollutes the space in my
> opinion. How does this sound?
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Dan Cote
> <terminationshok at gmail.com <mailto:terminationshok at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't mind having a slightly more serious working area,
> physically separate from the rest of the space. I'm thinking
> of a coffee shop style area. Anyone care to start an rfc for
> such an area? Is there a pattern for starting RFCs on the wiki?
>
> On Jun 1, 2013 9:32 AM, "Robert "Finny" Merrill"
> <rfmerrill at berkeley.edu <mailto:rfmerrill at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>
> So one of the primary complaints that people have about NB
> is that you
> can't get work done without people coming up to you and
> asking you
> tons of questions about what you're doing.
>
> I think this is a result of the fact that many of the
> events that
> introduce people to the space are learning-type events
> (CHM, other
> classes etc), and as such people tend to (initially, at
> least) think
> of NB as a learning environment.
>
> nb-as-learning-space and nb-as-getting-shit-done-space are not
> entirely opposed but do have some opposing features, so I
> think we
> should keep that in mind and come to a conscious decision
> on how we
> want to balance the two.
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130604/ce2c874f/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list